Categories
Anti-Oppression Anti-racism work Equity Health Care intersectionality lactation LGBTQ2S+ surrogacy understanding bias

Reflections on Trans Inclusion in Birth & Lactation Support

Miriam Main, one of the directors of La Leche League Great Britain (LLLGB) recently resigned because she objects to the organizational directive to be inclusive of all people who lactate, regardless of sex or gender identity. Her open resignation letter explaining her decision echoes much of the feedback we’ve heard in recent years from birthworkers who disagree with our use of language such as “chestfeeding”, “birthing person” and other terms aimed at ensuring that all people who birth babies and feed infants from their mammary glands feel included and supported with the resources required to meet their feeding goals. 

Her objections to trans inclusivity include:

  • Women cannot be physically and emotionally open with “men” present
  • Men will make LLL meetings unsafe
  • It might be dangerous for men to feed babies
  • Men feeding babies separates them from their mothers, causing damage to the mother-baby dyad.

November 20 is Trans Day of Remembrance. The day was founded in 1999 in protest of the murders of two Black trans women, Rita Hester and Chanelle Pickett. There is heightened tension regarding this day this year because of the US election outcome. Trans people in the US and elsewhere are deeply afraid that emboldened transphobes will be incited to violence. Further restrictions on trans people’s ability to access affirming care is likely coming. The inability to access gender-affirming care increases suicidality among trans people. While Main claims that she is not anti-trans rights, unfortunately, rhetoric like Main’s fans the flames of fearful and hateful myths putting trans lives in danger.

The Confusion About Main’s Objections

Main is against the presence of “men” at LLL meetings. Confusingly, she includes transmen and non-binary people in a list of types of “women” she has effectively supported at LLL meetings in the past as a leader. When she uses the term “men” she could be referring to trans men who gave birth to their babies or trans women using the lactation induction protocol to assist with feeding their babies. Through this confusing use of language, Main appears to be asserting that trans men are “women” and that trans women are “men”.

Main’s view is rooted in an idea called “gender essentialism”. This is the belief that there are two genders, that gender and sex are the same, and that the characteristics of the genders are an innate, hardwired aspect of our biology. While many people subscribe to this normative view, there is a growing body of evidence that it is scientifically inaccurate. Since the dawn of recorded history, in cultures around the world, there have been people who don’t fall into the binary sex and gender categories of “man/male” or “woman/female”. Many cultures have acknowledged more than two genders. Now science is catching up with these age-old lived experiences. 

Main’s statement recirculates several myths that we as birth workers need to dismantle:

Women Cannot be Physically & Emotionally Open with “Men” Present

Main argues that it would be impossible to maintain the open, honest environment of LLL meetings if men were present. How could women feel comfortable talking about things like chapped and mangled nipples, or nurse in front of others if men are present? Main doesn’t realize it, but she answers her own question. She notes that breastfeeding is “the great leveler”. She observes that LLL group participants put aside differences regarding race, religion, income, politics, and sexual orientation. They are united in their shared goal of feeding their babies from their bodies. Whether participants are cis women, trans men, or trans women they are all dealing with chapped nipples, sleepless nights, and internal and external pressure to use bottles. Imagine the world we’d be living in if we developed our ability to focus on what we share rather than what divides us.

Men Will Make LLL Meetings Unsafe

She also fears that women may not feel comfortable coming forward about domestic violence if men are present, noting that 1 in 4 women have experienced intimate partner violence. A Canadian study of trans people conducted in 2019 found that 3 in 5 trans women had experienced intimate partner violence. Contrary to some of the rhetoric surrounding the recent US election, trans women are not usually the perpetrators of violence. They are in the population that is at increased risk of experiencing gender-based violence. Cultivating the erroneous belief that trans people are a source of violence is a significant inciter of violence against trans people. This needs to stop immediately.

Damage to the Mother-Baby Dyad

The letter raises safety concerns that are fear rather than fact-based. She posits harm to mothers and babies caused by ripping babies from their mothers’ arms so that men can feed them. Like much of what is fueling the current trans panic, this is a total red herring. Babies are not being ripped from their mother’s arms so that men can feed them. In the case of trans men, they are usually the gestational parents of their babies. Non-gestational parents with breast tissue can induce lactation. This includes cis women, trans men, and trans women becoming parents through adoption, surrogacy, or their partner carrying the baby. The protocol to induce lactation is rigorous, involving high doses of hormones and domperidone for several months before the birth. In cases where nursing is shared between a gestational and non-gestational parent, this is with the consent of both parents. For anyone who has fed a baby with their body, it should be easy to see why sharing the load of this labour might be desirable. 

Regardless of the exact nature of the situation, it’s safe to assume that anyone showing up to feed a baby at a La Leche League meeting is a parent to that baby. That’s really all that should matter.

It Might be Dangerous for “Men” to Feed Babies

She asserts that it might not be safe for babies to be fed by a “man”. She cites no evidence of any safety concerns. This is because there is none. Aside from universal precautions regarding substance use or infectious disease, If milk comes from your nipples, you can feed it to a baby. Where supply is inadequate to meet the baby’s nutritional needs, this can be addressed as it would be for anyone. We all know how frustrating and overwhelming supply issues can be. Parents experiencing this challenge need more compassion and support, not less.

There’s no reason to believe that trans lactators are at increased risk of under-supply or babies that are failing to thrive. In response to Main’s open letter, IBCLC Ashley Pickett has shared some helpful research. She notes that “When people take hormones, they can still breastfeed. It hasn’t been shown to be dangerous. Many AFABs [assigned female at birth] are entering menopause, and breastfeeding while on HRT [hormone replacement therapy]. Some trans women have taken estradiol and domperidone and their breastfed babies thrive.”

The potential for trans women to lactate and nurse is a new phenomenon, and as such, bound to raise concerns. Ashley Pickett, IBCLC addresses this with the best available evidence also. She cites two articles showing no cause for concern at this time:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37138506/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7462406/

Drawing from the articles she cites, she also provides evidence to allay fears that hormones are crossing over into the milk supply and causing harm to babies:

“Spironolactone is poorly excreted into breastmilk and there are no reported adverse effects on infants.

Cyproteone Acetate (used for [male to female] transitions as well as more commonly for acne and hirsutism, alopecia, etc) in people [assigned female at birth] transfers at 0.2% of the parental dose. However, in trans HRT uses high doses. Switching to an injectable Estradiol Valerate may be enough to elevate estrogen and not require an anti-androgen, and safely breastfeed. Breast development would remain, but she may grow some unwanted hair.

GnRH treatment has been used in postpartum contraception for decades, and in this time, has been shown to be as low as undetectable in milk and up to 1-2 micrograms per feed at max. The amount ingested had no biological activity in the infant (would be destroyed in the gut before entering the system). When taken throughout pregnancies, as it has been for many many experiencing fertility care since the 1990s, there has been “no specific hazard observed” among newborns exposure.”

 ~

The REAL issue

Evidence has nothing to do with Miriam Main’s underlying fear. It is the same as that of our members complaining about our use of gender-inclusive language. She is afraid that she and her fellow cis women are being erased from spaces that should feel like home. While this fear is an understandable conditioned reaction to change, it is unfounded. Cis women continue to comprise the majority of people who birth and lactate. Our use of inclusive language is an action to begin opening the door for trans and non-binary people who birth and lactate to receive affirmation and support. For cis women reading this, take a moment to imagine what it would feel like to walk into an LLL meeting knowing that there will probably not be anyone else in the room who is like you, but you need help feeding your baby all the same. Would you be brave enough to walk into that room? Would you be grateful for any gesture that made it a little easier?

Letting trans folks in doesn’t erase us as cis women. It is not usually presented this way, but trans inclusion and acceptance create more freedom for cis women. As we dismantle rigid, binary gender constructs and break down boundaries regarding what a “woman” can or should be, we are all freer to express ourselves authentically. I was raised in a family of women who couldn’t leave the house without “putting their faces on”. Now, I wear makeup when I feel like it. I speak truth to power without hesitation because I’m not limited by the belief that being a “woman” requires passivity. Every day I engage in numerous actions that I take for granted that would have been unthinkable for a Black woman a century ago. I owe a huge debt of gratitude to racialized trans ancestors, like Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera, who started the Stonewall Riots, and with them, the queer liberation movement in North America.

If we let go of the fear of erasure, we can invite in the potential for trans people to enrich birth and lactation spaces. We may discover that the experiences of trans people add an important perspective on issues affecting all of us who experience gender oppression and gender-based violence. Community support and mutual aid are not finite resources. We don’t have to worry that by making space for trans people, cis women will be squeezed out. There is room in the circle for everyone.

 

About the Author

Keira Grant

Keira Grant (she/her) Inclusion and Engagement Lead – Racialized Communities

Keira brings a wealth of experience to the Online Community Moderator role. She is a Queer, Black woman with a twenty-year track record in Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) education, projects, and community building initiatives.

Categories
lactation

Breastmilk Isn’t Free: The hidden cost of human milk

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text title=”Breastmilk Isn’t Free: The hidden cost of human milk” css=”.vc_custom_1724336247678{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]August is Breastfeeding Awareness Month, or as I like to call it, Human Milk Month. In the birth world, most of us can rattle off the numerous benefits of bodyfeeding in our sleep. The probiotics, the antibodies, the bioengineered brain growing magic – the list goes on and on. In addition to the numerous health benefits, there are many practical incentives to feed human milk. Formula is exorbitantly expensive for lower-quality food. It’s easier to put a hungry baby directly to the breast in the middle of the night than it is to coordinate a sterile bottle mixed with sterile water while bleary-eyed. But we are way off base when we tell new and expectant parents that human milk is “free food”.

Singing the praises of lactation is tone-deaf to the fact that a need to return to work or school is the leading reason why new moms and birthers give up on nursing before 6 months. It takes a lot of privilege to produce on demand, unlimited food for another person for 6 months. Exclusively breastfeeding a newborn is a full-time job that doesn’t pay. It’s accessible to people who have the means to keep a roof over their heads and food for themselves in the fridge while absent from the workforce.

couple and their newbornIn Canada, we are fortunate to have the option to take maternity leave for up to 18 months. But there are several catches. Legally, your employer is required to reserve your job for up to 18 months. They are not required to compensate you during that time. If you are eligible for employment insurance (EI), the government will pay you 60% of your usual pay, up to a maximum. For most people who were working full time, this amounts to a significant loss of income. About 20% of employers in Canada will top up these EI payments to varying amounts and timeframes. The EI program makes payments for 12 months, therefore if you want to stay home for 18 months, the final 6 months are “self-funded” – i.e. you have zero income.

As for the many people who are not eligible for EI, unless they were in a position to set aside 18 months worth of savings or have spouses or other family members who are in a position to support them while they’re on leave, they will find surviving for even 6 months with no income quite difficult.

Unsurprisingly, racialized, Indigenous, low-income, and single birthers are more likely to need to return to work less than 6 months after they have their babies. During Indigenous Milk Medicine Week and Black Breastfeeding Week, we reflect on why breastfeeding rates continue to be lower for Black and Indigenous women than their white counterparts. This is a huge part of why. Until we address economic disparities, talking up the benefits of breastfeeding will not change outcomes.

We need to start framing the birthing person being home for at least 6 months as a human right for the baby and the birther. In the US, employers are only required to hold jobs for 6 weeks. This needs to be framed as a human rights violation, for mother and baby. So-called “breastfeeding friendly” workplaces do not cut it. Usually, this just means that there is somewhere other than a bathroom for lactating parents to express milk. This completely overlooks the logistical challenges of pumping and storing enough to keep a young baby fed during the workday and the emotional and psychological benefits of direct feeding.

We can look to examples in Europe, especially Nordic countries, for human rights models of lactation and new parenthood. In Sweden, new parents are entitled to be free from work and receive benefits for up to 18 months after their child is born. This entitlement can be shared by a couple or used by a single person. Unsurprisingly, Sweden and other Nordic countries have higher breastfeeding rates at 6 months than other high-income countries.

When my wife and I were born, mothers were entitled to 6 months’ leave. When I had my son 12 years ago, we were entitled to 12 months. Now people are entitled to 18 months. These are steps in the right direction that make sustained lactation and adequate bonding and recovery more feasible for many people. But there is still room for improvement, especially more support for working and working poor families. We need to see subsidizing the cost of human milk as an investment in a healthier future for children and families.

 

Keira Grant (she/her) Inclusion and Engagement Lead – Racialized Communities

Keira brings a wealth of experience to the Online Community Moderator role. She is a Queer, Black woman with a twenty-year track record in Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) education, projects, and community building initiatives.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Categories
birth lactation

Why We Need More Human Milk

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_single_image image=”509749″ img_size=”full” alignment=”center”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][mk_padding_divider][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1690821411248{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”] At Doula Canada we celebrate August  as Human Lactation Month. A month of honouring and celebrating the many lactation weeks that happen throughout August. Including but not limited to  World Breastfeeding Week 2023 is from Tuesday 1st August – Monday 7th August 2023. Indigenous Milk Medicine Week is held annually August 8-14.  Black Breastfeeding Week runs August 25th – 31st.  As we honour Human Milk pay attention to our blog and social media for more information and takeaways throughout the month.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][mk_padding_divider][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1690820935893{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]

Why We Need More Human Milk

I had a conversation with a new colleague with expertise in lactation support that blew my understanding of late-stage capitalist discourse on breast/chestfeeding wide open. She said that when we talk about the benefits of breastfeeding we construct formula as the baseline and feeding infants human milk as an added bonus. The construct should be to perceive human milk as a baseline and formula as an intervention that has risks and benefits and is to be used when feeding human milk is not an option.

Most of the clients I work with prenatally have a strong goal of feeding their baby their own milk exclusively for at least the first 6 months of life, and continue nursing after food introduction. Some have a goal of nursing for, up to two years. My clients understand that this goal tracks with evidence-based infant feeding recommendations. (The Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada and the World Health Organization) What they are often blindsided by is just how many obstacles exist to achieving that goal. 

Talking about the joys and the barriers to feeding our babies our milk is vital during Human Lactation Month (commonly known as Breastfeeding Awareness Month). Many of the specific obstacles to meeting feeding goals that I have seen are rooted in silence that starts long before the pregnancy.

Many of us have never held a baby or seen someone nurse before we’re attempting to feed our firstborns for the first time. That’s not normal. It used to be that our efforts to initiate chest/breastfeeding came after a lifetime of watching other milk-producing members of our community do this important job. As a result, we have a lot of catching up to do while we are overwhelmed with getting to know our new babes.

There is also silence about our bodies. We encounter people who have never touched their breasts and are uncomfortable with learning hand expressions. There are those who have never heard of colostrum and are therefore susceptible to well-meaning advice from family or professionals that their supply is not enough and that they need to supplement with formula on day one or two. 

And there is silence about the impact of intergenerational and individual trauma. There are Black folks who unexpectedly feel the humiliation of slave wet nurses rising inside them across time when they put their own newborns to the breast. There are Indigenous folks whose mothers have repeated to them what they heard from doctors in hospitals, away from their communities “formula is better than your breastmilk”.

The current evidence continues to be irrefutable that our milk is best for our babies. The probiotics in each person’s milk are custom designed for their baby, resulting in optimized digestive, immune, and cognitive functioning, and many other health indicators.  

If milk from the biological parent is not an option, human milk from a donor is the next best thing. Of course, there are many obstacles to human milk sharing as well, with attempts to walk this road often leading right back to formula.

Over the course of this month we’ll be sharing some fun, interactive content in support and celebration of human milk. Stay tuned for a lactation recipe box, an infographic on milk sharing, and some fun facts and tips about getting those juices flowing. Wishing you a productive August![/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][mk_padding_divider][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=”.vc_custom_1690821366833{margin-bottom: 0px !important;}”]Keira Grant (she/her) brings a wealth of experience to her EDI Co-Lead role. She is a Queer, Black woman with a twenty-year track record in Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) education, projects, and community building initiatives. As a mom and partner she uses her lived expereince to provide support and reflection for her clients and her work. Keira is the owner of Awakened Changes Perinatal Doula Services.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]